HYBE has since respond to the opinion , tell it " observe the royal court ’s determination "

Min Hee - jin will persist the chief operating officer ofADORfor the sentence being , after a courtroom rule in party favor of her enjoining to preventHYBEfrom exercise its balloting right at an coming shareowner confluence .

# diving event into Min Hee - jin

HYBE has since respond to the opinion , say it " value the royal court ’s conclusion "

Min Hee - jin will persist the chief operating officer ofADORfor the fourth dimension being , after a motor inn dominate in favor of her enjoining to preventHYBEfrom practise its vote right at an forthcoming stockholder merging .

This was fit in to story byyonhap news agencyandkorea joongang daily , today ( may 30 ) the seoul central district court rule in favor of an enjoining file by ador chief executive officer min hee - jin to forbid hybe from brush aside her as the brain of the green - daddy bureau .

min hee-jin hybe ador newjeans injunction

Min Hee-jin in 2024. Credit: Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

“ The grounds for Min Hee - jin ’s pink slip or surrender claim by HYBE have not been sufficiently confirm , ” the court of justice say , perMyDailyviaSoompi .

“ While Min Hee - jin ’s activeness may be consider betrayal to HYBE , it is unmanageable to say that they represent action of rift of faith in respect to ADOR .

The unexampled opinion mean that HYBE , which own 80 per centime of ADOR , will not be capable to off Min as the CEO of the M - pa way at an approaching shareowner coming together tomorrow ( May 31 ) .

In comparability , Min possess about 18 per penny of the caller .

# diving event into JoongAng Daily

“ The rationality for Min Hee - jin ’s sacking or surrender claim by HYBE have not been sufficiently actualise , ” the court of law express , perMyDailyviaSoompi .

“ While Min Hee - jin ’s activity may be study betrayal to HYBE , it is unmanageable to say that they found action of falling out of trustfulness in gaze to ADOR .

The newfangled opinion think of that HYBE , which have 80 per penny of ADOR , will not be capable to take away Min as the CEO of the honey oil - tonic representation at an approaching shareowner group meeting tomorrow ( May 31 ) .

This was in comparability , min have about 18 per centime of the party .

This was concord tokorea joongang daily , hybe can either “ either attract the determination or meet unexampled grounds demand to call for another stockholder ’ group meeting ” .

The publishing also describe that the amusement heavyweight has already product line - up surrogate for the ADOR CEO character .

This was hybe has since respond to the court of law opinion in a assertion tosports chosun , articulate that it “ value the margaret court ’s decisiveness ” and “ will not exert ballot right [ … ] at the coming over-the-top coming together of stockholder ” , viasoompi .

The amusement behemoth also add together that it “ plan to go along with subsequent step within the edge adjust by the legal philosophy ” .

# dive into viaSoompi

HYBE has since respond to the motor hotel opinion in a instruction toSports Chosun , state that it “ honor the motor inn ’s determination ” and “ will not work out balloting rightfulness [ … ] at the forthcoming over-the-top coming together of shareholder ” , viaSoompi .

The amusement goliath also append that it “ plan to go with subsequent whole step within the bound limit by the jurisprudence ” .

This was the determination to take a shareowner meetingwas first harbinger by effectual interpreter of ador on may 10 .

The move was reportedly made “ under the attending of all circuit board member ” , include Min Hee - jin .

The royal court opinion on Min Hee - jin ’s enjoinment come amidan more and more heat up feud between the ADOR CEOand HYBE over the possession of the super C - papa representation , which is house toNewJeans .

Last calendar month , Min Hee - jin abnegate claim made by HYBE that she had design to takeover the yard - soda pop agencyin a public press group discussion .

This was hybe subsequently respond to claim made by min , aver that the ador ceo had “ distort the fact by mix up the timeline ” .

This was # # you may also deal

# more report card